[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [alma-sw-ssr] Paris meeting agenda

To: <alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu>
Subject: RE: [alma-sw-ssr] Paris meeting agenda
From: "Brian Glendenning" <bglenden@aoc.nrao.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 19:43:59 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200004271859.MAA08825@paso.aoc.nrao.edu>
Reply-To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu
Sender: owner-alma-sw-ssr@kochab.cv.nrao.edu

>> 8) Correlator data processing
>shouldn't this all be done in post-processing?  just save the lag

Sorry if I've missed follow-ups in my email backlog. Is there any comment on
this suggestion of Bryan's? My assumption would be that we might want to
throw channels away before archiving, which requires spectra rather than
lags, but if I'm wrong and we can push the problem off to post-processing it
would make our lives (somewhat) easier for control software.

Cheers,
Brian

References:
- Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Paris meeting agenda
  - From: Bryan Butler <bbutler@aoc.nrao.edu>

Prev by Date: [alma-sw-ssr] review comments
Next by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Re: ALMA-SSR review
Prev by thread: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Paris meeting agenda
Next by thread: RE: [alma-sw-ssr] Paris meeting agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread