RE: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline and Pipeline Requirements

[mel wright 456 <wright@astron.berkeley.edu>]

Hello Bryan,

	 I intended that the test be done in aips++  by someone
who knows how. I'm sorry if this was not clear.

If the uv-data is essential in image analysis, this probably
precludes any commercial package.

	cheers,

		Melvyn

>If there is a significant increase in image fidelity by
>going back to the uv-data in the deconvolution of mosaiced
>images, then this has a very significant effect on the operational
>model for ALMA image analysis.
 
>It remains to be demonstrated that there is a meaningful
>increase in image fidelity with telescopes with real pointing
>and other errors, and what the cost in performance is.
 
>These tests should be done as soon as possible, and I would be happy
>to provide some data.
>