[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ALMA Science Software Requirements - an alternate spin

To: <alma-sw-ssr@web3.hq.eso.org>
Subject: RE: ALMA Science Software Requirements - an alternate spin
From: "Brian Glendenning" <bglenden@cv3.cv.nrao.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:51:27 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <002f01bf30ea$c05464a0$cafc30c1@pctcp72.iram.fr>
Reply-To: alma-sw-ssr@web3.hq.eso.org
Sender: owner-alma-sw-ssr@web3.hq.eso.org

> Such an off-line script could be
> derived from the data content, rather than from the observing procedure.

But wouldn't it need some information "passed through" from the proposal
preparation stage so it can decide how large the images should be, how to
weight the data, etc? At least at NRAO such parameters aren't in the
interferometric data products.

Cheers,
Brian

References:
- Re: ALMA Science Software Requirements - an alternate spin
  - From: "Stephane Guilloteau" <guillote@iram.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: an alternate spin
Next by Date: Observation blocks
Prev by thread: Re: ALMA Science Software Requirements - an alternate spin
Next by thread: Re: ALMA Science Software Requirements - an alternate spin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread